🔗 Share this article

Commentators have alleged the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, of adopting what is described as “dangerous” language about immigration, after he called for “very large scale” expulsions of persons from cities – and asserted that parents of girls would agree with his stance.

Unapologetic Position

Friedrich Merz, who became chancellor in May promising to address the rise of the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland party, this week chastised a reporter who asked whether he intended to revise his strict remarks on immigration from last week in light of extensive condemnation, or express regret for them.

“I am unsure if you have kids, and female children among them,” Merz said to the reporter. “Consult your girls, I expect you’ll get a very direct answer. I have nothing to take back; in fact I stress: it is necessary to modify the situation.”

Criticism from Rivals

Progressive critics accused Merz of borrowing tactics from far-right organizations, whose claims that women and girls are being targeted by foreigners with sexual violence has become a international right-wing mantra.

Ricarda Lang, charged that Merz of promoting a patronising comment for female youth that failed to recognise their actual policy priorities.

“Maybe ‘the daughters’ are also frustrated with Merz showing concern about their entitlements and security when he can use them to justify his entirely outdated strategies?” she wrote on X.

Security Focus

The chancellor said his priority was “protection in public areas” and highlighted that provided that it could be assured “will the mainstream parties restore faith”.

He had drawn flak recently for remarks that critics said hinted that variety itself was a problem in German cities: “Of course we still have this problem in the cityscape, and for this reason the interior minister is now endeavoring to allow and implement removals on a very large scale,” commented during a trip to the state of Brandenburg near Berlin.

Bias Accusations

Clemens Rostock accused Merz of fueling discriminatory attitudes with his remark, which sparked limited protests in various German cities over the weekend.

“This is concerning when incumbent parties seek to label people as a difficulty according to their physical characteristics or origin,” Rostock said.

Social Democrats MP Natalie Pawlik of the Social Democrats, government allies in the current administration, stated: “Migration must not be branded with oversimplified or popularist automatic responses – this divides society more deeply and in the end helps the incorrect individuals as opposed to encouraging resolutions.”

Political Context

The conservative leader’s party coalition recorded a underwhelming 28.5% result in the recent federal election compared to the anti-foreigner, anti-Islam AfD with its historic 20.8 percent result.

Since then, the right-wing party has matched with the Christian Democrats, exceeding their support in certain surveys, in the context of voter fears around immigration, crime and economic stagnation.

Previous Positions

The chancellor rose to the top of his organization vowing a firmer stance on immigration than the longtime CDU chancellor Merkel, rejecting her “wir schaffen das” catchphrase from the migrant crisis a decade ago and attributing to her partial accountability for the rise of the AfD.

He has fostered an at times more populist tone than the former chancellor, infamously blaming “little pashas” for repeated vandalism on the year-end celebration and asylum seekers for filling up dental visits at the expense of nationals.

Electoral Preparations

Merz’s party gathered on the weekend to hash out a plan ahead of multiple regional votes during the upcoming year. Alternative für Deutschland holds substantial margins in several eastern states, nearing a historic 40 percent backing.

The chancellor maintained that his organization was united in preventing partnership in governance with the far-right party, a approach widely known as the “barrier”.

Internal Dissent

Nonetheless, the recent poll data has spooked some Christian Democrats, leading a small number of organization representatives and strategists to propose in the past few weeks that the policy could be untenable and counterproductive in the long run.

The dissenters argue that while the 12-year-old AfD, which internal security services have designated as radical, is capable of snipe from the sidelines without having to implement the challenging choices governing requires, it will benefit from the ruling party challenge afflicting many democratic nations.

Academic Analysis

Scholars in Germany have discovered that conventional organizations such as the Christian Democrats were progressively permitting the far right to set the agenda, unintentionally normalizing their ideas and spreading them further.

While the chancellor declined using the phrase “barrier” on the recent occasion, he insisted there were “basic distinctions” with the AfD which would make partnership unworkable.

“We acknowledge this difficulty,” he said. “We will now further make it very clear and directly the AfD’s positions. We will distance ourselves distinctly and unequivocally from them. {Above all