🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to protect women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, requiring governments to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable debates in additional member states